Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Seggerman vs Gerard Campana Lee Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seggerman vs Lee analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Seggerman vs Gerard Campana Lee Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Seggerman 0 - 1 Lee
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seggerman has won 51.44% of points on their second serve, while Lee has won 50.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seggerman, in recent form, has won 44.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lee has won 51.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.74% and 33.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seggerman has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lee has saved 53.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seggerman has won 64.81% of matches played (W/L 35/ 19), with Lee winning 55.56% (W/L 35/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seggerman has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 47/ 41), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Seggerman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 16/ 12), where as Lee has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.81% of matches (W/L 22/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seggerman winning 0 times and Lee being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seggerman winning 0 and Lee winning 2. The last match between Seggerman and Lee was at the Mexico City Challenger, 01-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Gerard Campana Lee getting the victory 6-3 7-6(9).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seggerman and Lee have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seggerman winning 0 times and Lee 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Seggerman winning 0, and Lee 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seggerman has played against opponents with an average rank of 173.72 while Lee has played against players with an average rank of 250.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seggerman has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lee has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seggerman has converted 36.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lee has converted 45.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
469
Rank
463
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
332
Rank
332
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
62% (44-27)
Career Total W/L
52% (48-44)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
47% (14-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ryan Seggerman vs Gerard Campana Lee For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Seggerman VS Lee
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Ryan Seggerman | Gerard Campana Lee |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:8 | 1:23:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 45% (30/67) | 62% (42/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (25/30) | 81% (34/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (19/37) | 73% (19/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 22% (15/68) | 34% (23/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(9) |
Stats 
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Ryan Seggerman
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
5
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
23 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Seggerman | Gerard Campana Lee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 47% (14/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (22/22) | 49% (34/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (217/226) | 50% (335/333) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 47% (14/16) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.73 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 158 | 72 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 118 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:43 | 1:54:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 264.26 | 254.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (802/1323) | 63% (1316/2092) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (593/802) | 63% (833/1316) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (268/521) | 50% (389/776) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (35/95) | 46% (94/206) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (448/1350) | 41% (848/2072) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (10/9) | 47% (14/16) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (9/18) | 48% (14/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 76% (17/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 24% (17/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (13/4) | 8% (13/1) |
Ryan Seggerman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Ryan Seggerman
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Ryan Seggerman
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ryan Seggerman
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Neil Oberleitner
62%
(
66 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
16
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
53 of
66)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
109)
105
Total Points Won
111
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Matej Dodig
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
10
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
0-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
4
Total Points Won
1
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Calum Puttergill
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Ryan Seggerman
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Daniil Glinka
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerard Campana Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Martin Klizan
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
89)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Marco Cecchinato
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Giovanni Fonio
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Seggerman Vs Lee Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Seggerman are available here and Lee photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gerard Campana Lee
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
